USPTO serial 99746237
BIG CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IP, KENNINA NGA-YU
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BIG CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian TORPY
818 South 67th StreetOmaha, NE 68106United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Buns; Rolls; Sausage rolls; Bread rolls; Bread and rolls; Burgers contained in bread rolls; Frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Bakery desserts; Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, candies, and frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Flour-based dumplings stuffed with meat; Sauce; Steak sauce; Barbecue sauce; Sauces; Dipping sauces; Grilling sauces; Cooking sauces; Ready-made sauces; Sauces for barbecued meat; Basting sauces used in cooking meat; Savory sauces used as condiments; Basting sauces used in roasting meat; Marinades | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |