USPTO serial 99762965
RELEVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with RELEVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. George, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRITTANY RATELLE
BRITTANY RATELLE RATELLE LAW, LLC285 Prairie Shopping CenterSte 258Hayden, ID 83815Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shorts, sweatpants, shirts, tee-shirts, sweatshirts, blouses, jackets, vests, coats, rainwear, shoes, lingerie, sleepwear, loungewear, swimwear, gloves, socks, hosiery, belts, scarves, hats, ties, skirts, dresses, and sweaters | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Barrettes; Hair slides; Hair scrunchies; Bobby pins; Hair bands; Rubber bands for hair; Hair clips; Hair accessories, namely, hair sticks; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair ties; Non-electric hair curlers, other than hand implements; Hair netting; Ponytail holders and hair ribbons; Hair chopsticks; Hair clamps; Hair extensions; Hair bows; Hair tinsel being hair decorations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |