Drawing for SUPER WITCH

USPTO serial 99765154

SUPER WITCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER WITCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond G. Areaux (#33,643)

Raymond G. Areaux (#33,643) Carver, Darden, Koretzky, Tessier, Finn, Blossman & Areaux LLC601 Poydras Street, Suite 1900New Orleans, LA 70130United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ice cream; ice cream cakes; ice cream sandwiches; reduced-fat ice cream, namely, soft serve; reduced-fat ice cream, namely, frozen dessert in the form of soft serve; reduced-fat ice cream, namely, frozen dairy-based dessert in the form of soft serve; cookies; cookie pieces; cookie brittle; caramel sauce; caramel syrup; caramel spread; caramel topping for ice creamACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 2026TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
May 4, 2026PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 15, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 15, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 15, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance