Drawing for CHEAP BASTARD

USPTO serial 99768699

CHEAP BASTARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEAP BASTARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Schneider

Mark D. Schneider Dinsmore & Shohl LLP755 West Big Beaver RoadSuite 1900Troy, MI 48084

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruit and vegetablesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 16, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 16, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 16, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance