USPTO serial 99975835
KOIDOCK WALLEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALI, KRISTIN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with KOIDOCK WALLEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew L. Eisenberg
Andrew L. Eisenberg Lee & Hayes, PC601 W Riverside Ave Ste 1400Spokane, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing data analysis in the field of logistics, supply chain, and manufacturing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing and analyzing image data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for processing and analyzing image data using machine learning; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for recognizing, monitoring, and tracking assets, containers, equipment, and vehicles; providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for recognizing, monitoring, and tracking assets, containers, equipment, and vehicles; and artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for recognizing, monitoring, and tracking assets, containers, equipment, and vehicles; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data analysis in the field of logistics, supply chain, and manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |