Drawing for LE TANNEUR

USPTO serial 73215980

LE TANNEUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1633130Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 1991
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE TANNEUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DONALD L DENNISON

612 CRYSTAL SQ 41755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016STATIONERY ITEMS, NAMELY, LETTER OPENER CASES, LETTER BOXES, NOTEPAD HOLDER, PENCIL CUPS, TELEPHONE INDEXES; [ MAP CASES SOLD WITH MAPS; MAP CASES SOLD EMPTY; ] PORTABLE AND DESK BLOTTER HOLDERS; PEN AND PENCIL CASE FOR DESKS; DESK CALENDAR; CALENDAR HOLDER FOR DESKS; STATIONERY CASE INCLUDING POCKETS AND POUCHES FOR HOLDING STATIONERY ITEMS, NAMELY, SHEETS OF PAPER, ENVELOPES, STAMPS, PENS AND BLOTTERS; [ PLAYING CARD CASES; ] CHECK BOOK CASES AND BINDERSEXPIREDJun 11, 1970
018LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER AND ARTICLES MADE FROM THESE MATERIALS; NAMELY [ SKINS; HIDES; TRUNKS; ] VALISES; TRAVELLING BAGS; LUGGAGE; HANDBAGS; BRIEFCASES; KEY CASES; BUSINESS CARD CASES; ATTACHE CASES; BILLFOLDS; WALLETS AND PURSES; CHANGE PURSES [ ; UMBRELLAS; PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKS; WHIPS; HARNESSES AND SADDLERY ]EXPIREDMay 10, 1970
020JEWELRY CASESEXPIREDMay 10, 1970
025BELTSEXPIREDMay 10, 1970
034[ CIGARETTE LIGHTERS; CIGAR AND CIGARETTE BOXES; BOTH PORTABLE AND FOR USE ON DESKS; CIGARETTE AND CIGAR CASES; AND ASHTRAY HOLDERS FOR DESKS ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 4, 1978

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2002CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Feb 20, 19978.PRREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED
Feb 20, 19978.PRREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED
Jan 29, 19978.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED
Jan 29, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 18, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 15, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 8, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 19, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 7, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 29, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 1988PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 21, 1988PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 21, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 1987PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 7, 1987PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 21, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 13, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 1986REINREINSTATED
Apr 28, 1980CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 1979DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance