USPTO serial 73249288
PRODUCE PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 1982
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRODUCE PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
COMMERCE, CA
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDITH SAPP
JUDITH SAPP KOMONDOROK LLC111 W STPORTLAND, ME 04102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cole Slaw Mix, a Blend of Vegetable Tidbits, Sunflower Seeds, Crumbled Ham and Bacon-Flavored Soy Protein Bits Used as a Topping for Salads, a Blend of Dried Onions, Potatoes, Chives, Parsley, Herbs, Spices and Bacon-Flavored Soy Protein Bits Used as a Topping for Potatoes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 1980 |
| 030 | Vegetable Sauce Mix, Garlic Flavored Croutons, and Strawberry Glaze | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Libby, McNeill & Libby, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Libby, McNeill & Libby, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCE PARTNERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Libby, McNeill & Libby, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PRODUCE PARTNERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1989 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 18, 1988 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 1988 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 29, 1988 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1982 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 1982 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |