USPTO serial 73274982
INTERROGATABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KURZBARD, MYRA K.
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERROGATABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. Buskirk
JOHN F BUSKIRK C/O PACESETTER SYSTEMS, INC12884 BRADLEY AVESYLMAR, CA 91342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical Instruments-Namely, Instruments in the Nature of Tissue Stimulators Implantable in a Living Body | ABANDONED | Jun 11, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 1985 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 15, 1985 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1980 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |