USPTO serial 73307900
FLASH STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1969018Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 1996
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLASH STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tennoji-ku, Osaka, JP
Tennoji-ku, Osaka, JP
Tennoji-ku, Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN J. SPIVAK
MARVIN J SPIVAKCRYSTAL SQ FIVE STE 4001755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1983 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |