USPTO serial 73320803
TITANALOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TITANALOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Worthington, OH
Worthington, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. David Emhardt
C DAVID EMHARDT WOODARD WEIKART EMHARDT & NAUGHTONONE INDIANA SQ STE 2670INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental Implants Made from Titanium Alloy | ABANDONED | Nov 29, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 1986 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1985 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |