USPTO serial 73346469
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dallas, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
LOUISVILLE, KY
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
LOUISVILLE, KY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen Asher
Kathleen Asher Philips Intellectual Property & Standards345 Scarborough RoadP.O. Box 3001Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | STAGE LIGHTING SYSTEM COMPRISING A CENTRALIZED COMPUTER CONTROLLED SYSTEM FOR REMOTELY CONTROLLING LIGHT MODULES TO PROVIDE A DESIRED STAGE LIGHTING PATTERN OR SEQUENCE OF PATTERNS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 1981 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 1990 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1990 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 6, 1990 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 1990 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1984 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |