USPTO serial 73394419
CHICAGO STYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CHICAGO STYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BURTON S. EHRLICH
BURTON S. EHRLICH Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHEESE, [ MARASCHINO CHERRIES, ] VEGETABLE OIL AND SHORTENING, MAYONNAISE, SALAD DRESSING, VINEGAR, FROZEN AND CANNED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, [ SOUP BASE, ] DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT, PICKLES, OLIVES, PROCESSED PEPPERS, FROZEN MEATS EXCLUDING PROCESSED MEATS AND SAUSAGES, PASTA, BOTTLED AND CANNED WHOLE, PUREED AND CRUSHED TOMATOES, AND TOMATO PASTES FOR USE BY FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ GROUND AND INSTANT COFFEE, TEA, BREAD STICKS, CRACKERS, ICE CREAM CONES, ] SPICES, SUGAR, SALT, FLOUR, [ HONEY, ] MUSTARD, SAUCES, EXCLUDING CRANBERRY SAUCE AND APPLE SAUCE, SPICES, AND PICKLE RELISH AND TOMATO SAUCES, AND FLAVORING SYRUPS FOR USE IN THE PREPARATION OF MILK SHAKES FOR USE BY FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | WHOLESALE FOOD DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BATTAGLIA DISTRIBUTING CORP., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHICAGO STYLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 27, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 16, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 16, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 1988 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1984 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 5, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |