USPTO serial 73397712
HUMANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUMANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONT., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE C/O FAY & SHARPE400 NATIONAL CITY E SIXTH BLDGCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES-NAMELY, DETERMINING THE MANAGEMENT NEEDS OF CLIENTS BY MEANS OF ANALYSIS OF DATA GENERATED BY INTERVIEWING OF EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS AND CONDUCTING ON-SITE INSPECTIONS OF CLIENT FACILITIES | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES-NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND CONDUCTING CUSTOMIZED TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR BUSINESS MANAGERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 1986 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 7, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |