USPTO serial 73414321
LUIGI'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUIGI'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Skenyon
JOHN M SKENYON1012 INDUSTRIAL BANK BLDGPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Catering Services and Bakery Services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |