USPTO serial 73417758
SUZUKI METHOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUZUKI METHOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NAGANO-KEN, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PASQUALE A. RAZZANO, ESQ.
PASQUALE A RAZZANO ESQ CURTIS, MORRIS & STAFFORD, PC530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PHONOGRAPH RECORDS AND PRERECORDED AUDIO MAGNETIC TAPES. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |