USPTO serial 73431555
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HOPKINS, MN
HOPKINS, MN
HOPKINS, MN
LAKELAND, MN
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID N. FRONEK
DAVID N FRONEK DORSEY & WHITNEYPILLSBURY CTR S220 S 6TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 1994 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |