USPTO serial 73432855
UNITAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNITAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SAMUEL C. MILLER, III
SAMUEL C MILLER III BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISWASHINGTON & PRINCE STSTHE GEORGE MASON BLDGALEXANDRIA, VA 22313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | LEASING OF BUSINESS, OFFICE, CONSTRUCTION, MANUFACTURING, HEALTH CARE AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES; AND LEASING OF CONSUMER GOODS | ABANDONED | May 6, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 3, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |