USPTO serial 73436312
CON SEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CON SEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH H. CHILTON
RALPH H CHILTON PRUTZMAN, KALB CHILTON & ALIX750 MAIN ST STE 610HARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LIQUID-TIGHT FLEXIBLE CONDUIT FOR ELECTRICAL WIRING | ABANDONED | May 9, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 8, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |