USPTO serial 73465576
CITILINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITILINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HELEN V. DANYO
HELEN V DANYO, ASST. SECRETARY CITIBANK, N A399 PARK AVE32ND FLNEW YORK, NY 10043Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ABANDONED | Oct 30, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 27, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |