Drawing for SUZUKI VIOLIN SCHOOL

USPTO serial 73465911

SUZUKI VIOLIN SCHOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUZUKI VIOLIN SCHOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PASQUALE A. RAZZANO

PASQUALE A RAZZANO ESQ CURTIS, MORRIS & SAFFORD, PC530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009RECORDS, CASSETTE TAPESABANDONED—
016MUSIC BOOKS, MUSIC TEXTBOOKS AND RECORD JACKETS USED IN THE INSTRUCTION OF MUSICABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 14, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 7, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 18, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 14, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 11, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance