USPTO serial 73481323
BIOSAFETY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOSAFETY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A. BARDIN
FULWIDER, PATTON, RIEBER, LEE & UTECHT3435 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 2400LOS ANGELES, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | DISPOSAL CONTAINERS FOR BIOMEDICAL WASTE; DISPOSAL CONTAINERS FOR NEEDLES AND CATHETERS, AND HOLDERS FOR SUCH CONTAINERS; CYTOXIC SPILL KITS COMPRISING SAFETY GLASSES, RESPIRATORY MASK, ABSORBENT TOWELING, ABSORBENT SPILL MAT, AND GLOVES; AND MEDICAL GOWNS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1986 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |