USPTO serial 73490503
NEFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID W.R. LANGTON
ROGERS, BERESKIN & PARRP O BOX 313COMMERCE COURT POSTAL STATIONTORONTO, ON M5L 1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | APPLIANCES, NAMELY REFRIGERATORS, STOVES, MICROWAVE OVENS, WASHERS, DRYERS, DISHWASHERS; FUME HOODS; SINKS; FAUCETS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 1, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |