Drawing for OCEAN STAR

USPTO serial 73491247

OCEAN STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OCEAN STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FERNANDA M. FIORDALISI

BUCKNAM AND ARCHER600 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY LI, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FOOTWEAR, TROUSERS, SHORTS, BERMUDA SHORTS, SKIRTS, KNITWEAR NAMELY SWEATERS, PULLOVERS, CARDIGANS, LEISURE JACKETS, ANORAKS, OVERCOATS, SHIRTS, SCARVES, HEADWEAR, SWEATSUITSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 1988ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 11, 1988OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 1988OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 1988OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 9, 1987OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 1987OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 1987OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 1987OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 1987OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 1987OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 1987OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 2, 1986OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 8, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 1986CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 28, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance