USPTO serial 73491993
OPIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROSS F. HUNT, JR. ROSS F. HUNT, JR.
LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING MADE FROM WOVEN AND/OR KNITTED MATERIALS AND/OR LEATHER FOR MEN AND WOMEN, NAMELY COATS, JACKETS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, TROUSERS AND PULLOVERS; AND ACCESSORIES FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS, NAMELY SCARVES FOR HEAD AND NECK, NECKTIES, BELTS, HOSIERY, ESPECIALLY STOCKINGS, GLOVES, SHOES AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY HATS AND CAPS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 16, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |