USPTO serial 73510750
FLASH FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1467559Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 1987
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLASH FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ALBANY, OR
ALBANY, OR
ALBANY, OR
ST. LOUIS, MO
ALBANY, OR
ALBANY, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest G. Bootsma, Ronald L. Saxton
ERNEST G BOOTSMA ATER WYNNE LLP222 SW COLUMBIA, STE 1800PORTLAND, OR 97201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SOUPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 22, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OREGON FREEZE DRY FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OREGON FREEZE DRY FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OREGON FREEZE DRY, INC
- Other trademarks owned by SEVEN-UP COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by OREGON FREEZE DRY, INC
- Other trademarks owned by OREGON FREEZE DRY, INC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named FLASH FRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 9, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 9, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |