Drawing for EXAL

USPTO serial 73513112

EXAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EXAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

IAN JAY KAUFMAN

IAN JAY KAUFMAN LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001HYDRATED SILICATE OF MAGNESIUM, ESPECIALLY TREATED FOR USE AS A CORRECTIVE EXCIPIENT IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ANIMAL FEEDABANDONED—
019CLAYSABANDONED—
020MEERSCHAUMABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 16, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 28, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 15, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 2, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 1986CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 1985CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 13, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance