USPTO serial 73527690
MANHANDLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANHANDLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROSS F. HUNT, JR.
ROSS F HUNT JR LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | VEHICLE MOUNTED AERIAL WORK PLATFORMS CAPABLE OF BEING TOWED | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |