USPTO serial 73539079
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KUNGALV, SE
KUNGALV, SE
KUNGALV, SE
KUNGALVSGRUPPEN ARENG, HJERPE, WALLMANDER AB
KUNGALV, SE
Other trademarks owned by KUNGALVSGRUPPEN ARENG, HJERPE, WALLMANDER AB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD TRAUB
HAROLD TRAUB BALOCH, OSANN, KRAMER, DVORAK, ET AL39 BROADWAYSTE 1815NEW YORK, NY 10006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER BASED POSITION FINDING SYSTEM COMPRISING A POSITION COMPUTER, VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINAL, COLOR GRAPHIC COMPUTER, TRANSPONDERS, AND VIDEO MONITOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION AND FILM FEATURES AND DISTRIBUTION OF SAME FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |