USPTO serial 73551222
BERGHOFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1503192Status 800
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BERGHOFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
CHICAGO, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
CHICAGO, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
Madison, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
MADISON, WI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rick L. Abegglen
Rick L. Abegglen Rick Abegglen Attorney at Law LLC2935 S. Fish Hatchery Rd. No. 120Fitchburg, WI 53711United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEER | ACTIVE | Jun 3, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BERGHOFF RESTAURANT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, THE
- Other trademarks owned by WISCONSIN BREWERY LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BERGHOFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 29, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 26, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 18, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |