USPTO serial 73570526
FAVORITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAVORITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND C. STEWART
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH301 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDY, PASTRY, CHOCOLATES, COCOA, SUGAR, HONEY, BON BONS, CREAMS, SWEETENED FLAVORED GELATINES, CANDY DROPS, COOKIES, CAKES AND BISCUITS | ABANDONED | Jul 22, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 27, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |