USPTO serial 73590455
SWAN-NECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWAN-NECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL A. WELTER
PAUL A WELTERFREY MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, PA1600 MIDWEST PLZ BLDG801 NICOLLET MALLMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHERTERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 18, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |