USPTO serial 73615493
SMALLFRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMALLFRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY B. DIEPENBROCK
ANTHONY B DIEPENBROCK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWRONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, NAMELY DISK DRIVES, PRINTERS, DISPLAY PANELS AND KEYBOARDS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS COMBINED WITH TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINES | ABANDONED | Aug 8, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 25, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |