USPTO serial 73632466
CATZ AUSTRALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 1990
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CATZ AUSTRALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. WARD, JR.
RICHARD J WARD JR CHRISTIE, PARKER AND HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S AND BOYS' ACTIVE WEAR; NAMELY, WALKING SHORTS, SLACKS, BOARD SHORTS, T-SHIRTS AND SPORT SHIRTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 18, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |