USPTO serial 73643467
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CARACAS 1010, VE
CARACAS 1010, VE
CARACAS 1010, VE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
5676 RIVERDALE AVEBOX 900NEW YORK, NY 10471-0900| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | ALLOYS FOR DENTAL AMALGAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |