USPTO serial 73652129
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. KANE
LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ PERFUME, EAU DE TOILETTE, EAU DE COLOGNE, MAKEUP BASE, DAY CREAM, POWDER, POWDER BRUSHES, LIPSTICK, NAIL POLISH, EYE SHADOW, EYE SHADOW APPLICATORS, MASCARA, EYE LINER, EYE MAKEUP REMOVER, MAKEUP REMOVER, PERFUMED WATER, NIGHT CREAM, AND BODY OIL ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | PULLOVERS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, JACKETS, COATS AND TROUSERS | EXPIRED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |