Drawing for O'TOOL'S BABY

USPTO serial 73652482

O'TOOL'S BABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with O'TOOL'S BABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALFRED N. GOODMAN

ALFRED N GOODMAN ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2680UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010PLASTIC INFANT TEETHING BLOCKS IN THE SHAPE OF HAND TOOLS AND CLOTH HANGING STORAGE ORGANIZERS SOLD AS A UNITABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 7, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 19, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 20, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 31, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 4, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance