USPTO serial 73677447
LITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 1989
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FENG YUAN CITY, TAICHUNG HSIEN, TW
FENG YUAN CITY, TAICHUNG HSIEN, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE F. DVORAK
GEORGE F DVORAK BALOGH, OSANN, KRAMER, DVORAK, ET AL53 W JACKSON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | COMPUTER-CONTROLLED MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY DRILLS, LATHES, MILLING MACHINES, BORING MACHINES, GRINDING MACHINES, AND EXCAVATORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 26, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 11, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |