USPTO serial 73697692
PM/PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROGERS, GERARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PM/PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARL A. RANKIN
CARL A RANKIN PEARNE, GORDON, MCCOY & GRANGER1200 LEADER BLDGCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ROTARY METAL-CUTTING TOOLS-NAMELY, MILLING CUTTERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |