USPTO serial 73700365
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN E. VANDERBURGH
JOHN E VANDERBURGH PLANTE STRAUSS VANDERBURGH & CONN0RSSTE 4001020 N BROADWAYSANTA ANA, CA 92701| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | LAWN AND TURF AERATING MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |