USPTO serial 73704431
NEARLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 1989
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEARLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
LOUISVILLE, CO
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
LOUISVILLE, CO
SANTA CLARA, CA
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
LOUISVILLE, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT COMPRISED OF AN AUTOMATED TAPE CARTRIDGE LIBRARY SYSTEM, NAMELY DRIVES FOR MAGNETIC TAPE, CONTROL PROCESSOR, COMPUTER MEMORY UNITS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL AND DOCUMENTATION THEREFOR SOLD AS A UNIT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NEARLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |