USPTO serial 73710955
NEON LITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEON LITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEYER A. GROSS
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN & GROSS230 PARK AVE STE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | SPIRIT BASED COOLERS, NAMELY GIN, RUM, VODKA AND WHISHEY, AND LUQUEURS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |