USPTO serial 73720147
LOCK-TIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOCK-TIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
COVALENCE SPECIALTY MATERIALS CORP.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Other trademarks owned by COVALENCE SPECIALTY MATERIALS CORP.
PHOENIX, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Maldjian
John P. Maldjian MALDJIAN & FALLON LLC365 BROAD STREETTHIRD FLOORRED BANK, NJ 07701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PLASTIC RESEALABLE FREEZER BAGS FO HOUSEHOLD USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXXON CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by EXXON CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by COVALENCE SPECIALTY MATERIALS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLISLE PLASTICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LOCK-TIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 5, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 16, 1996 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |