USPTO serial 73734332
REGISTERED VASCULAR TECHNOLOGIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REGISTERED VASCULAR TECHNOLOGIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AMERICAN REGISTRY OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHERS, INC.
CINCINNATI, OH
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN REGISTRY OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHERS, INC.
AMERICAN REGISTRY OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHERS, INC.
CINCINNATI, OH
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN REGISTRY OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHERS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD B. RACINE
RICHARD B RACINE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | CLOTH PATCHES FOR CLOTHING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN REGISTRY OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN REGISTRY OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named REGISTERED VASCULAR TECHNOLOGIST
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |