USPTO serial 73742667
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK ZAID
FRANK ZAID OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURTP O BOX 50FIRST CANADIAN PLTORONTO, ON M5X 1B8| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES; NAMELY, THE OPERATION OF TAKE OUT AND DELIVERY CHINESE FOOD RESTAURANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 5, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |