USPTO serial 73757173
INSTA-CHAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTA-CHAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE H. MORTIMER
GEORGE H MORTIMER3687 N LITTLE ROCK DRPROVO, UT 84604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | NON-SKID DEVICES FOR LAND VEHICLES, COMPRISING CHAINS SECURED AT ONE END TO A ROTATABLE DISK WHICH MAY BE MOVED TO A POSITION ENGAGING THE DISK WITH THE SIDE WALL OF A TIRE TO ROTATE AND THROW THE ATTACHED CHAINS INTO THE SPACE IN FRONT OF THE ROTATING TIRE | ABANDONED | Nov 17, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1990 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 22, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |