USPTO serial 73761356
SSB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SSB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ENGLEHART, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET ALSTE 7001100 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | RECONSTITUTED WOOD PANELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |