USPTO serial 73784916
AXO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELTZER, ELEANOR
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AXO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OSPEDALETTO, DI ISTRANA, TREVISO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES MICHAEL HALE
JAMES MICHAEL HALE KNOBBE, MARTINS, OLSON & BEAR620 NEWPORT CTR DR 16TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROTECTIVE KIDNEY BELTS, CHEST PROTECTORS FOR MOTORCYCLE RIDERS, MOTORCYCLE HELMENTS, VISORS FOR MOTORCYCLE HELMETS, SUNGLASSES AND LIFE VESTS | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1981 |
| 018 | ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, MOTORCYCLE BOOT BAGS, BELT BAGS, BACK PACKS AND WALLETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, JACKETS, SWEAT SHIRTS, PANTS, SWEAT PANTS, HATS, SHORTS, TIGHTS, MOTOCROSS SOCKS, CYCLING SOCKS, SHOES, INSOLES, SHIRTS, JERSEYS, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, BOOTS, MOUNTAIN BIKE BOOTS, MOTORCYCLE BOOTS, MOTOCROSS GLOVES, MOTOCROSS PANTS; AND WATER SPORTS APPAREL, NAMELY WET SUITS, BOOTIES AND GLOVES | ABANDONED | Mar 7, 1984 |
| 028 | CYCLING GLOVES AND KNEE PADS FOR ATHLETIC USE | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 1991 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |