USPTO serial 73795715
Serial No. 73795715
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 1992
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 73795715?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75008 PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNER, SCHWARTZ, ET ALP O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PREPARATIONS FOR CLEANING, POLISHING, DEGREASING, AND SCOURING FOR HOUSEHOLD USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL SPONGES WITH OR WITHOUT AN ABRASIVE SURFACE, SPONGE CLOTHS, DISH DRAINERS, SPONGE RAGS, SYNTHETIC CHAMOIS CLOTHS, STEEL-WOOL SCOURING PADS, FLOOR CLOTHS, BROOMS AND PARTS THEREOF; TOILET SPONGES; NAMELY, SPONGES FOR BODY CARE AND HYGIENE, SPONGES FOR THE BATH, MASSAGING SPONGES, SPONGES FOR REMOVING MAKEUP; NON-WOVEN SCOURING PADS IMPREGNATED WITH SOAP OR NOT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 22, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |