USPTO serial 73796250
DEJA VU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POMPEY, TINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEJA VU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER M. BROCK
CHRISTOPHER M BROCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE5445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | BAR AND NIGHTCLUB SERVICES | ABANDONED | Sep 15, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 6, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |