USPTO serial 73810485
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN
DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN, KIRSCHSTEIN, ET AL551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176-0024UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | APPLE JELLIES AND JAMS, CANNED APPLES AND APPLESAUCE | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | APPLE TREES, FRESH APPLES AND APPLE TREE BUDS | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | FRUITS DRINKS CONTAINING WATER, APPLE JUICE AND APPLE FLAVORED SYRUPS FOR MAKING APPLE FLAVORED DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | FERMENTED APPLE JUICE | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |